Introduction to the new features of Revit 2014 Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Revit 2014 was released last March 25th. A great review was written the day after by David Light. Read that post if you are interested and check the Autodesk video below expleining new features. Oh! And check the cool new design of the Autodesk website and logos, starting by the Revit one itself!
How to insert on your page an embedded and editable Google Drive / Docs Spreadsheet Català - Castellano - Deutsch
First of all and before you wonder if this is another place were they tell you how to do it and it doesn't work, this is testet, and here is the proof, play with is as much as you like.
So now that you know that it works, let's go step by step.
Create a Spreadsheet in Google Drive
Share it with those you want to be able to access it (the one on this post is shared to the entire www)
Make sure the other users can edit, not just see
Insert the following code on your site: <iframe width='800' height='600' frameborder='0' src='THE URL OF YOUR SPREADHSEET AS IT SHOWS ON THE WEB BROWSER WHEN YOU SEE IT FROM GOOGLE DRIVE'></iframe>
The Meeting of the European Group for Lean Construction will take place in Valencia, Spain, next May Català - Castellano - Deutsch
The coming 8th, 9th and 10th of May, 2013, the European Group for Lean construction will hold its meeting in Valencia, Spain. Top Lean Construction Experts like Prof. Glenn Ballard (creator of the Last Planner System), Paulo Napolitano and Alan Mossman will be there sharing their experience.
A brief review on this book that introduces you to .NET programming to create Revit Add-ins Català - Castellano - Deutsch
The people at Packt Publishing have published a book about customizing Revit using the Revit API and .NET programming language. The title of the book is Instant Autodesk Revit 2013 Customization with .NET How-to by Don Rudder.
The book is a very packed guide to creating your first Revit Add-ins. It is actually the type of book that is a bit hard to follow, but in a good sense. It does not waste time explaining you basic stuff you would already know (or that you can easily find online) if you want to create Revit Add-Ins. So from the first lines you have to pay attention to what you are reading or you get lost after two pages.
I have not had the time to try the code samples provided but the book (many), but overall it seems to me as a good introduction to the basics of Add-in programming, its logic, language and basic steps. If I had a say on the book editing, I must confess I would have given it a bit of a more refined look and a bit less intense pace, for it seems a bit intense to me, jumping from one example to the next one without much time to assimilate what you are learning.
If I end up finding the time to actually program something, then I'll update this post with that experience.
Book is very affordable, selling for $11.99 at the Publishers Page for the Ebook version. Yo can also buy hard copies of the book at Amazon (links below).
The last version of the Industry Foundation Classes, IFC4 was oficially released last tuesday, and it is ready for download. Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Just read through BIMnova about the launch of the latest release of the IFC exchange standard. For those new to the topic, the IFC, or Industry Foundation Classes, are a standard format developed by Building Smart that can be used to exchange and share BIM data between applications developed by different software vendors without the software having to support numerous native formats [1]. In other words, it is the common format for exchanging BIM data bwtween different applications.
The Release reads:
After over 6 years of development and over 1100 issues being resolved, on 12. March 2013 buildingSMART international has finally released the new generation of IFC schemas - IFC4. It will now be the basis of future work of establishing new open BIM enabled work flows by defining new IFC4 based model view definitions. The official IFC4 release includes both the IFC4 EXPRESS schema to support current STEP-based IFC exchanges, and the ifcXML4 XSD schema to support new simple ifcXML transactions.
Detailed documentation on the new IFC4 can be found here.
The list has been updated and reformated for a better user experience Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Just a short post to let you know that I have updated the list of BIM Standards. The major update is that I have turned the list into a sortable table so you can organize the list however you want by clicking on the table headers. I still have some standards missing that I will ad during this coming week, but now that the table is life you can start using it and of course sharing any missing standards so you will appear on the credits of the post!
The 2013 National BIM Report about UKs AEC Industry is available online. Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Just got the news via Construction Code and Stephen Hamil that the newest NBS UK National BIM Report is available for download here. It has the latest survey info on the status of BIM adoption and opinions of the AEC professionals of the UK about it's current and future use. Let me quote couple of paragraphs that I think are a very good summary of it's contents:
The good news is that progress continues to be made in BIM adoption. The 2012 survey shows the percentage of the industry actually using BIM has grown to 39%, up from 13% in 2010. (...)
(...)BIM adopters can see that BIM is more than just ‘seductive graphics’ and ‘sexy 3D’.
They can demonstrate that effective information management leads to business efficiency
and profitability.(...)
(...)It will be the cultural and behavioural changes that many will find most difficult, and yet I believe these will prove to be the most important if we are to be successful.(...)
OK, so here you have it, plenty of useful insights. Congratulations to the #UKBBIMCrew involved on this!.
A living list of the latest BIM standards available online. A list that will be updated regulary Català - Castellano - Deutsch
I've been trying to find as many BIM standards as possible for what is the seed of my next paper. I thought I'd share them here. In no way this means there are no other BIM Standards available, it simply means I haven't found them, so please share in the comments if you know another set of published BIM standards that are available online and that I haven't added to the list.
UPDATE: I have turned the list into a table that can be sorted clicking on the headers. THis way it is easy to sort the standards by country,or date or name, etc.
Audoesk seems to be suing Revitforum. Don't they have any sense of bad online campaings? Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Got the message I am quoting below from RevitForum. Apparently, Autodesk wants to take over their domain because it uses the word Revit. Look, I am no expert on copyright laws and domain names, but it seems kind of stupid to ban a community of users to talk about your product. Are the guys at Revit Forum making money because of the use of the Revit name? Not sure, but even if they do, isn't it logical that a Forum where people talk about revit should be called "something with revit + something with Forum"?
Our apologies for the mass email - we try to avoid these as much as
possible, but we feel it's very important that we share this news with
all of our members as soon as possible.
As some of you may be aware, Autodesk, Inc., makers of Revit, have
retained the law firm of Donahue Gallagher Woods to notify all domain
holders that have the word REVIT contained in their top-level domain
name, that they are infringing on the Autodesk REVIT trademark. They
have requested that we change the domain name of revitforum.org to one that doesn't contain the the word REVIT.
We refute these claims of infringement. The use of the trademark "REVIT" in the domain name "revitforum.org"
is protected by the "Nominative Fair Use" legal doctrine that provides
an affirmative defense to trademark infringement as enunciated by the
United States Ninth Circuit, by which a person may use the trademark of
another as reference to describe the product.
The administrators of revitforum.org will formally respond to Autodesk. However, if all else fails, we want to assure you that we are prepared to move revitforum.org to a new domain if that is required.
Whether or not there is a domain name change, rest assured that the
forums will continue to operate just as they do now. We retain all the
data on revitforum.org - that is not in any way at risk.
We will notify you via email and on the revitforum.org website of any required domain name change ahead of time.
p.s. if you know an attorney with the appropriate expertise who is
willing to donate their time for this good cause, please feel free to
contact a forum administrator privately.
Hate this type of Goliat attitudes big companies have sometimes. What do you think? UPDATE: Apparently, Autodesk has replied and seems to be willing to not force a change of domain name if the forum changes some stuff and adds a disclaimer about not being affiliated at all with Autodesk. Well, that seems fair. Not sure if it is a response to the fact that the news about this have spread quick or of really good-hearted company behavior but the result will be the same so I guess things are not as bad as they seemed at the beginning.
A lot of fuzz about Foster's plans to print buildings on the moon, but shouldn't we work harder to develop something like this on earth? Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Ok, so Foster and Partners have been working for the European Space Agency to develop a system to print buildings on the moon. I read the same news like 25 times in different blogs, and magazines since Jan 31st. Yes, it is the type of short news that travels the web at lightning speed, but I think that considering the last time the man was on the moon was in 1972 maybe it's just that, a short article intended to give a lot of publicity to Foster, the ESA and Monolite UK, (the company that have envisioned the large scale 3D printer system called D-Shape) because they added the "one the moon" ending.
Although there are rumors of plans from China to go to the moon, not much of it is known to be really true. So as I see it, the "moon" part of the news is not very relevant on the short term (although it is the reason why everyone is talking about it). What makes an interesting read is what's behind the technology to do that. The guys at Monolite UK have developed the D-Shape printer, a 3D printer that can actual print things as big as 6 by 6 meters, not bad at all.
What is even more interesting is the materials used as a building substance. According to the sources, the D.-Shape printer: "returns any type of sand, dust or gravel back to its original Compact Stone state. The Stone is very similar to Marble (...) and with a resistance and traction much superior to Portland Cement (sic), so much so that there is no need to use iron to reinforce the structure". Well, if that is true, I think the real innovation is that, much more than the fact that they have built a 3D model to show structures on the moon.
Why this is not being used already in real buildings if it is cheaper, faster, stronger and allows all kind of shapes like the inventors claim? No idea, something might still not be 100% proof ready, but anyways its an interesting experiment.
Related to this, I remembered a video I saw some months ago about a research going on at a research group at the University of Southern California. The research is called Contour Crafting, and it aims to something very similar, to be able to sort of print parts of the building and to actually use a sort of huge crane to automate construction. Here is a video about it.
This research from USC, although it has some points I think they need rethinking, seems more developed than the "print on the moon" experiment. It is based on using some standard construction procedures combined with the automation of a big part of the construction of the structure. Is this the (near?) future?
So let's think about it, printing on the moon when we don't know exactly how to do it on earth seems a bit of a far shot, but these too experiments show a trend that I think will slowly evolve and that has huge repercussion, the slow replacement of construction man-labor by machine automated work. Let's review in a couple of years how much of this is actually on the real world!
A new add-in to manage your families in revit. And it is free. Català - Castellano - Deutsch
Got the heads up from Luke Johnson about this new, and free, add-in for Revit available at the Autodesk Exchange app page. I haven't tried it but it looks promising.Quoting the app developers HTSSIndia:
The purpose of this tool is to directly load families from one Revit project to another i.e., this tool enables the users to easily look in to the views, types, parameters of the families in a Revit project file and directly load the selected families in to the current Revit project or save them as ‘rfa’ files in the given PC path.
So now it is easy to transfer families from project to project knowing exactly what you are transferring. Excellent.
Without this add in, you can transfer families from one project to another using the Transfer Project Standards tool in revit. But then you would be transfering without so much control of which families you actually copy, so this add-in is worth it.
To install it, download the add-in from here, then run the installer.
Did you delete an object by mistake and kept workin? OOPS! No worries, you can have it back! Català - Castellano - Deutsch
If you delete an object in AutoCAD, keep working, and then you realize you shouldn't have deleted it and want it back, there is a command in AutoCAD that allows you to get that object back.
The OOPS command in AutoCAD will bring back the last deleted object, even after you kept working and doing more stuff. It has its limitations as you can imagine (for instance if during that "kept workin" you deleted something else) but still can save you from having to redo stuff.